Pet Store Okotoks, AB

Exotic PetsThese species can no longer be brought, sold, bred or kept in B.C. for private ownership. For a clickable map of all state laws and their texts, see For a color-coded map of state regulations, see For the text of all state laws concerning exotics, see The purpose of this section, rather than to particularly discuss each and every state or nearby law, is to give a couple of examples of the key types of regulations, and to compare these approaches to exotic pets.

Typically, the City or County Council have determined that possession of particular exotic species poses a serious threat to the health, security, and welfare of the residents of the community as a result of a current attack in the region, an escape, or by the virtue of the animals’ physical attributes and organic behavior and, as such, adopts an ordinance regulating or banning private possession.

It enumerates a long list of prohibited species by their scientific and common names, like the typical exotic pets like tigers, primates, and wolves, as nicely as some far more obscure animals such as scaly anteaters, stingrays, and pandas, to name just a few. Across the nation, many incidents have been reported exactly where exotic animals held in private hands attacked humans and other animals, and escaped from their enclosure and freely roamed the community. Other than the boa and the bush infant (my sister-in-law has a single) I had no idea these other animals had been kept as pets.

Finally, to a lesser degree, lawmakers think about animal welfare in prohibiting or restricting exotic pet ownership. The animals on this list (fennec fox, tiny wild cats, tamandua, bush baby, sloths, boa constrictor, wallaby, deer, capybara) are either not normally taken from the wild to supply the pet trade in the U.S. or never. Exotic pet laws must also model Michigan’s practice of prohibiting any future animal ownership by individuals violating exotic pet laws.

Nonetheless, courts have virtually universally upheld the validity of exotic pet regulations as a legitimate exercising of state police energy that does not infringe on the constitutional protections of equal protection, due method, or takings. Although states like Texas use permit systems to regulate exotic pets, other states employ them to supplement their bans. As such, there are fewer obstacles to passing exotic pet regulations at the state level. The court, in upholding the ordinance, found a rational relationship amongst the regulation and the public interest in stopping exotic pet attacks.