Detailed Discussion Of Exotic Pet Laws
Whenever you bring residence a new exotic pet, whether or not they are old or young, from a recognized breeder or the street, constantly take your exotic pet for an initial veterinary check out. The City Well being Code unambiguously prohibited the keeping of a monkey as a pet, and the court refused to construe an exception for harmless pets New York City , N.Y. , Rules of the City of New York , tit. She might not have stated her sources, but it has been made recognized to the public by vetrinary and animal groups (not just animal rights activists) that exotic animals do not make good pets. The Massachusetts director of the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife also problems a list of exempted species for which no permit is needed.
For a clickable map of all state laws and their texts, see For a color-coded map of state regulations, see For the text of all state laws concerning exotics, see The purpose of this section, rather than to specifically discuss every state or neighborhood law, is to give a few examples of the significant varieties of regulations, and to examine these approaches to exotic pets.
Although this appraisal more than-simplifies the concern to some degree, it is accurate that our reduction of animals to pets and our belief in our ability to own them is buttressed by the words we use to talk about animals. In the exotic pet context, some owners have argued that regulations depriving them of their pets constitute a taking of their animal for the public welfare, and that they ought to obtain just compensation for their loss. If and when the individual realizes he/she can no longer care for an exotic pet, he/she generally turns to zoos and other institutions such as sanctuaries to relieve him/her of the responsibility.
Even so, courts have virtually universally upheld the validity of exotic pet regulations as a reputable physical exercise of state police power that does not infringe on the constitutional protections of equal protection, due procedure, or takings. Even though states like Texas use permit systems to regulate exotic pets, other states employ them to supplement their bans. As such, there are fewer obstacles to passing exotic pet regulations at the state level. The court, in upholding the ordinance, found a rational connection in between the regulation and the public interest in preventing exotic pet attacks.
As the respective courts did in Wright , New York City Buddies of Ferrets , and Rhoades , the Iowa Supreme Court employed the rational relationship test in evaluating Kent’s claim, holding that the county interest in public wellness and security was sufficiently related to the ban on keeping dangerous animals as pets. Uncover out how your state, city and county regulates private possession of exotic animals. Moreover, considering that several exotic pets live in dirty and stressful conditions, they are more likely to contract and transmit illnesses like salmonella.